Research Objectives
This project aims to:
- Identify and classify behavioral patterns among general practitioners (GPs) and their practices.
- Investigate the stability of these patterns over time at both the individual and practice levels.
- Develop a typology of practices and GPs through advanced statistical methods, such as dimensionality reduction and clustering.
- Assess the relationships between practice-level characteristics and individual GP behaviors to identify drivers of prescribing, diagnostic test ordering, and referral behaviors.
- Contribute evidence to inform policy interventions aimed at reducing unwarranted variability and improving healthcare equity.
3. Background and Rationale
The behavior of GPs and their associated practices plays a pivotal role in healthcare delivery, influencing patient outcomes, resource allocation, and system efficiency. Studies have documented significant variability in prescribing, diagnostic test ordering, and referral patterns across practices, yet the underlying factors driving this variability remain incompletely understood.
While demographic and structural factors account for some differences, the psychological and behavioral tendencies of GPs, as well as the organizational characteristics of practices, offer unexplored insights into this variability. The integration of behavioral and practice-level data into a cohesive framework offers a unique opportunity to understand the mechanisms shaping decision-making in general practice.
Existing studies, such as Bucks et al. (1990), have introduced typologies of GP attitudes and propensities. However, these studies have been limited in scope and lack a longitudinal dimension. This project will address these gaps using contemporary datasets and statistical techniques, providing a deeper understanding of healthcare behaviors and their stability over time.
4. Research Questions
This research will address the following questions:
- What are the key variables that describe practice-level and GP-level behaviors?
- How stable are these behaviors over time, and what factors influence their temporal consistency?
- What typologies emerge when clustering GPs and practices based on their prescribing, diagnostic, and referral behaviors?
- How do practice-level characteristics (e.g., size, continuity of care, demographic composition) influence individual GP behaviors?
- Can multi-level models provide insights into the hierarchical nature of general practice variability?
5. Methodology
5.1. Data Collection and Preparation
- Datasets:
- NHS prescribing data categorized by British National Formulary (BNF) chapters.
- Diagnostic test ordering data grouped by clinical categories from published studies.
- Practice-level data: size, continuity of care indices, referral patterns, demographic composition.
- GP-level data: propensity for specific prescribing and test-ordering behaviors, psychological propensities (e.g., interventionist tendencies).
- Adjustments:
- Rates will be adjusted for demographic and case-mix factors (e.g., patient age, sex, chronic disease prevalence) to isolate intrinsic behaviors.
- Tools:
- Data extraction and cleaning tools (e.g., SQL-based database queries, R/Python for data wrangling).
- Access to supplementary datasets as referenced by the project supervisor.
5.2. Analytical Framework
- Step 1: Variable Derivation
- Prescribing behaviors: Analyze prescribing rates for drug groups (e.g., antibiotics for upper respiratory infections, proton pump inhibitors for dyspepsia).
- Diagnostic behaviors: Categorize diagnostic test requests (e.g., cholesterol testing in males aged 50-59).
- Practice-level characteristics: Include continuity indices, population characteristics, and referral rates.
- Step 2: Temporal Stability Analysis
- Conduct longitudinal analyses to assess the stability of key behaviors over a defined period (e.g., 2010–2020).
- Employ correlation analysis, time-series regression, and clustering to evaluate stability and trends.
- Step 3: Dimensionality Reduction
- Use Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to reduce high-dimensional data while retaining key explanatory features.
- Step 4: Clustering Analysis
- Apply clustering algorithms (e.g., k-means, latent profile analysis) to identify typologies of practices and GPs.
- Validate clusters using silhouette scores, bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses.
- Step 5: Multi-level Analysis
- Explore hierarchical relationships between practice-level and GP-level behaviors using multi-level regression models.
- Quantify intra-cluster correlations (ICC) to assess the extent of shared behavior within practices.
6. Anticipated Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
- Data Availability:
- Challenge: Access to comprehensive datasets with sufficient granularity.
- Mitigation: Collaborate with data custodians early in the project; prioritize publicly available datasets.
- High Dimensionality:
- Challenge: Managing complex, multi-dimensional datasets.
- Mitigation: Use robust dimensionality reduction techniques and computational tools like Python and R.
- Attribution of GP Behaviors:
- Challenge: Attribution of prescribing/test-ordering behaviors to individual GPs.
- Mitigation: Focus on new prescriptions/test requests and leverage algorithms to attribute behaviors accurately.
7. Expected Outcomes
- Typologies: Comprehensive typologies of practices and GPs, providing new insights into behavioral patterns.
- Behavioral Insights: Quantitative evidence on the stability of prescribing and diagnostic behaviors over time.
- Hierarchical Models: Advanced statistical models linking practice-level and GP-level behaviors.
- Policy Implications: Evidence-based recommendations for reducing unwarranted variability in general practice.
8. Contributions to the Field
- Scientific Contribution: This research will contribute to the fields of healthcare analytics, behavioral science, and general practice by introducing novel typologies and multi-level insights.
- Practical Application: Findings will guide policymakers and healthcare administrators in designing interventions to enhance the quality and consistency of primary care.
9. Timeline
| Year | Milestones |
| Year 1 | Literature review, dataset acquisition, variable derivation. Develop preliminary framework for analysis. |
| Year 2 | Conduct stability analyses, complete dimensionality reduction, and perform initial clustering. |
| Year 3 | Multi-level modeling, validation of findings, and drafting initial papers. |
| Year 4 | Finalize thesis, submit journal articles, and disseminate findings at conferences. |
10. Resources Required
- Access to prescribing and diagnostic test ordering datasets.
- Software tools for data analysis (e.g., R, Python, and statistical packages).
- Collaboration with supervisors for domain expertise and dataset interpretation.
This proposal aims to address the complexities of multi-level variability in general practice while ensuring practical and scientific relevance. Please let me know if there are further refinements or specific points you’d like emphasized.
Leave a Reply